[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 379: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 379: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/feed.php on line 173: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3823)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/feed.php on line 174: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3823)
care-tags.org fashion and friends 2016-10-02T16:32:32-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/feed.php?f=3&t=1902 2015-04-27T09:09:04-04:00 2015-04-27T08:54:38-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/viewtopic.php?t=1902&p=59062#p59062 <![CDATA[Re: Questionable Ethics]]> Statistics: Posted by bobo77 — Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:54 am


]]>
2015-02-20T15:08:33-04:00 2015-02-20T15:08:33-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/viewtopic.php?t=1902&p=54969#p54969 <![CDATA[Re: Questionable Ethics]]> Statistics: Posted by Bobbin.Threadbare — Fri Feb 20, 2015 3:08 pm


]]>
2016-10-02T16:30:48-04:00 2015-02-18T17:56:20-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/viewtopic.php?t=1902&p=54820#p54820 <![CDATA[Re: Questionable Ethics]]> Statistics: Posted by sidewalk — Wed Feb 18, 2015 5:56 pm


]]>
2015-02-18T03:50:52-04:00 2015-02-18T03:50:52-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/viewtopic.php?t=1902&p=54784#p54784 <![CDATA[Re: Questionable Ethics]]> i think thats right, i know its at least a common sentiment in regards to the law so im sure theres some analogous position in ethics

thanks for clearing things up. ill try not to be pedantic with my terms especially since im probably wrong but i thought moral nihilists were non cognitivists and denied that there was a truth apt 'sense'/proposition to moral sentences, whereas some antirealists still hold that there are true moral sentences. in any case, i agree that morality isn't like math in the sense that the rules that should generally be followed are necessarily routes to truth (or goodness) or anything like that.
i still have the same inclinations as others, ie buying from places that legitimately tend away from more exploitative labour seems like a righteous thing to do in the short term at least. boycotting places that are known to have sweatshops is a start.

q2 for care-tags: should we spend money on new clothes produced by relatively social companies as opposed to buying used clothes? i think the former might be a way to expand more ethical markets which seems good.
q3: is this a question that empirical data can/must solve? i really have no idea so id love to hear everyones thoughts.

Statistics: Posted by absurdmind — Wed Feb 18, 2015 3:50 am


]]>
2016-10-02T16:31:06-04:00 2015-02-17T16:53:31-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/viewtopic.php?t=1902&p=54730#p54730 <![CDATA[Re: Questionable Ethics]]> Statistics: Posted by sidewalk — Tue Feb 17, 2015 4:53 pm


]]>
2015-02-17T06:50:18-04:00 2015-02-17T06:50:18-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/viewtopic.php?t=1902&p=54689#p54689 <![CDATA[Re: Questionable Ethics]]>
also im not sure what moral nihilists really believe. do you consider yourself to be a moral nihilist? do you believe there is semantic content in claims about what is good or right? i think many people who identify as moral nihilists are anti-realists but i dont think the two should be conflated (and i dont mean to patronize you here, thats just been my experience)

Statistics: Posted by absurdmind — Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:50 am


]]>
2015-02-17T05:54:20-04:00 2015-02-17T05:54:20-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/viewtopic.php?t=1902&p=54688#p54688 <![CDATA[Re: Questionable Ethics]]> 1. That's the opposite of what I said.
2. I don't see why being an outlier from an incredulous norm would be representative of anything other than your interest in fashion. I also don't understand why you're asking.
3. Learn to tag


This thread is mental masturbation in and of itself. You participated, so you're equally as guilty. Stop the self-righteousness and buzzword defining of things you don't like. There wasn't a post for over two weeks then you pop in to say some irrelevant garble. Is it "mental masturbation" because you don't accept that ethics is deeper than whether you believe something is right or wrong? You're equally as guilty of delusional grandeur as anyone else if you really just want this thread to be "talking about brands behaving badly", because then you're implying that we have to already have the same preconceived ideology as you to participate.

Statistics: Posted by sidewalk — Tue Feb 17, 2015 5:54 am


]]>
2015-02-16T16:17:22-04:00 2015-02-16T16:17:22-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/viewtopic.php?t=1902&p=54635#p54635 <![CDATA[Re: Questionable Ethics]]> Why do you consider the pursuit of good to be one of the only answers as opposed to trying to not feel bad? While they sound like the same concept the second is much more interesting when you talk of self harm and suicide. Suicide is one of the most logical ways to not feel bad, seeing as you cannot feel after you are dead.

Despite the two ideas being intertwined in the pleasure principle the two methods of acting are quite often at conflict. Similar to how people who wear experimental outfits take risks in their appearance in the attempts to look outstanding, it often is risky to chase pleasure. On the opposite side it is quite easy to look basic and not stand out, but you get little reward. Do you think that a persons general style or choice of outfits worn could be used as an indicator of their outlook on life?

Statistics: Posted by guardimp — Mon Feb 16, 2015 4:17 pm


]]>
2015-02-10T12:46:52-04:00 2015-02-10T12:46:52-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/viewtopic.php?t=1902&p=54172#p54172 <![CDATA[Re: Questionable Ethics]]> Statistics: Posted by Bobbin.Threadbare — Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:46 pm


]]>
2016-10-02T16:32:21-04:00 2015-01-27T15:33:22-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/viewtopic.php?t=1902&p=52945#p52945 <![CDATA[Re: Questionable Ethics]]> Statistics: Posted by sidewalk — Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:33 pm


]]>
2015-01-27T04:03:15-04:00 2015-01-27T04:03:15-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/viewtopic.php?t=1902&p=52920#p52920 <![CDATA[Re: Questionable Ethics]]>
I'm not sure what you mean when you say that saying that your philosophy is full holes is deriving conclusions that even the greatest minds cannot answer. Though perhaps I would be wrong to say that it is full holes, but I really can't tell when you're actually speaking your mind, posing questions, or insulting people. I actually agree with parts of your original post on the thread, though I disagree with the cynicism that you present with it. I too agree that changing your personal habits are really only for your own benefit because the amount of time and people required to create any significant change is far too much to change things for the better before we start having to deal with these catastrophes that are coming up (environmental and otherwise). However, my conclusion is that we should instead work to try to enact systemic change. I mean if the human condition is really so parasitic and miserable, why aren't we all offing ourselves?

Statistics: Posted by Stingray Sam — Tue Jan 27, 2015 4:03 am


]]>
2015-01-27T00:08:20-04:00 2015-01-27T00:08:20-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/viewtopic.php?t=1902&p=52901#p52901 <![CDATA[Re: Questionable Ethics]]>
it's fine to think our efforts to make the world a better place are in vain but that doesn't mean you should come to the dedicated place for people who do think that way to talk about it and continue to derail the thread after being told that the way you're presenting your ideas isn't wanted

Statistics: Posted by mc-lunar — Tue Jan 27, 2015 12:08 am


]]>
2016-10-02T16:32:32-04:00 2015-01-26T18:45:32-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/viewtopic.php?t=1902&p=52859#p52859 <![CDATA[Re: Questionable Ethics]]> Statistics: Posted by sidewalk — Mon Jan 26, 2015 6:45 pm


]]>
2015-01-26T11:28:17-04:00 2015-01-26T11:28:17-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/viewtopic.php?t=1902&p=52810#p52810 <![CDATA[Re: Questionable Ethics]]>
And the argument that, because we all own computers, clothes, shoes, coffee pots, etc. that were made by underage / underpaid people in the 3rd world, we can't critique the system that allows for that to happen has never really held much water for me, sorry.

Statistics: Posted by frogosaurus — Mon Jan 26, 2015 11:28 am


]]>
2015-01-26T11:25:05-04:00 2015-01-26T11:25:05-04:00 https://old.care-tags.org/viewtopic.php?t=1902&p=52809#p52809 <![CDATA[Re: Questionable Ethics]]> Statistics: Posted by oucho — Mon Jan 26, 2015 11:25 am


]]>