by maj » Thu May 21, 2015 6:39 am
How do you kill them? Is it the usual shot to the head.
To myself killing anything to me is weird, I just wouldn't do it and it's why I try to avoid stuff which does. To me killing stuff itself is inhumane, I don't need to do it and if that means sacrificing a few inches of height or a bit of maximum strength so be it, I sit at a desk all day. Then again I was raised in a town environment, my country side of the family are all for it nature managements I've seen and studied are all for it for it which are the two sides of environmental approaches I see. Vegans vs sustainable management essentially. I'm totally against mass produced/industrial meat any form any reason but although I wouldn't eat it, partake of endorse it, have a *sympathetic* view towards the hunting/ management side.
What's your view on the documented health gains to avoiding meats in the long term?
Quite interested as The argument I see for the eating of wild meat is usually that it's inline with primitive man and that's when we developed the most/ fastest. But to someone who lives now the advantages seem somewhat marginal compared to that of the benefits plant based offers, smoother digestion, less chance of severe illnesses in later life and generally working better within large populations without material and monetary subsidies (ignoring the fact the best thing for the world is all humans disappear which is absolute) in the broadest terms. My partner is a biologist who looks into the health benefits of diet and foods and was indifferent about eating meat until she saw what it does in the long term and now has moved to a "reducatarian" approach, constantly battling not over "meat tastes so fucking good" vs "it's so horrid to my health".
I'm just not sure what to believe on the argument front, although lean to plants r gr8 for me personally and I just don't want to kill anything ever as much I can do within my control.