by wiggly--woo » Wed Mar 12, 2014 12:15 pm
oops, this was meant to be a short post but it kind of grew into something bigger. apologies if it reads like the ramblings of a mad man.
i don't think its unusual for bisexuals to feel somewhat disconnected from the lgbt scene, which is perhaps better described as an lg scene given that there is a small, but significant part of the lgbt scene that does not view bisexuals and transgendered individuals particularly favourably. The issue of inclusiveness for transgendered people is perhaps more understandable given that it is an issue of gender identity as opposed to sexual identity but, in truth, identity formation in regards to both sexuality and gender have a lot of common ground, particularly with regards to gender as a discursive process. In terms of bisexuality it's not unheard of for homosexuals (and, of course, heterosexuals) to simply dismiss bisexuality (particularly in males, curiously) as being non-existent, and this is obviously not helped by homosexuals who choose to 'stagger' the 'coming out' process by claiming to be bisexual, and so for many people bisexual identity is simply a false intermediary. However, in my view, the key problem with bisexuality is that most bisexuals can lead perfectly happy and fulfilling lives within heteronormal society, and perhaps without ever needing to come out. The result, I think, is that many bisexuals never really connect with the non-heterosexual scene/cause, or do so but only covertly; and that some homosexuals are perhaps envious of this.
Having said that everything I just wrote above was a massive generalisation and simplification, and I'm not really in a position to add much to the debate, as I haven't had any direct involvement with the lgbt movement. However, the fact that bisexuals often feel disconnected from that scene, which has been alluded to in other posts, is quite a small problem in the grand scheme things, at least from my point of view anyway. I'd say that the biggest problem with the lgbt scene is that it continues to (re)present itself in opposition to hetero-sexuality/normativity. Of course, I admit that it is virtually impossible to invent a sense of community amongst heterogeneous non-heterosexuals and non-cisgendered individuals without differentiating yourself in someway and, somewhat inevitably, 'othering' those who don't belong, but I feel that in most 'Western' countries it's time to move on to the next stage. Feminists and post-structuralists have been pulling heteronormativity apart and looking at how its produced discursively (i.e. heterosexuality is no more 'natural' than any other sexual identity) for quite a while now, and I think it'd be good for the lgbt movement if these discourses started filtering into popular discourse. If people began to see society in terms of patriarchy and performance/performativity I think it'd be beneficial in a lot of different ways. I'm not really sure where I'm going with this, maybe I've just read too much of Judith Butler.
Anyway, arriving at the point i originally wanted to make, i think my utopian vision (for lack of a better term) is a society where sex/gender (feel free to distinguish between the two, even if i personally would say that they're essentially the same thing and both socially constructed) is completely irrelevant in terms of sexual/romantic attraction. As far as I'm concerned humans are always going to be attracted to other humans and gender/sex just seems to be a completely arbitrary way of categorising this attraction. So my utopia is where 'lesbian', 'gay', 'bisexual' etc are all eliminated from populist language/discourse and its simply accepted that people are attracted to others, sometimes people of the same gender, sometimes people of the opposite gender. Though, of course, my true utopia would pretty much dispense of gender/sex altogether, atleast in its current linguistic and discursive sense.
I'm not entirely sure if I have any idea what I just wrote.