by maj » Sat May 16, 2015 2:53 pm
While I can't imagine what it's like to have someone ripped from your family or friends in such a tragic incident, I think the idea that those involved are calling it justice is nothing unusual, many families or friends of those victims of "lesser" crimes resulting in death would call anything less than the death penalty injustice. The principle of "eye for an eye" is what fuels most death sentence debate, why should they get to live at all, incarcerated or not when they killed one or many people? That in itself is pretty vengeful thinking, although I can see the sense it makes to those affected. On the other hand If a person is being tried for taking the life of another, then why should the state have the authority to take a life and call it justice?
The job of the judiciary system isn't there to appease families of the victims in a direct sense, as harsh and saddening as that may be to them. It's to be a unbiased 3rd party to sentence crimes in a humane, rational and democratic way, even if the crime itself is far from that as hard as it may be.
I'm personally against the death penalty in any form, but I see why many call for it.