The first part is in regards to the artist and my impression of her work, not a personal attack. The second was an oversight which I corrected just now. My problem is that her political views are simplistic and her expression of them are uncreative and a chore to listen through. I never said artists have a responsibility to please. They have a responsibility to think carefully about expressing their opinions that are unrelated to music, since their visibility comes from their artistic and not political work. To release an album that shits on Obama in the middle of an election year when the primaries have been determined is an idiotic move. In light of what I imagine the majority of her audience are, leftists, this album promotes apathy and ill-timed resentment.
Like, what could be a more irrelevant and stupid political message right now? The album was released about a month ago, it was already Trump vs. Hillary, and this album is about drone strikes and torture. Not to open up a political discussion here, but what is the most logical action of those who take this album to heart? I would guess they probably supported Bernie and are now thinking of not voting in consideration of Hillary's platform on the same issues.
To clarify:
http://dronecenter.bard.edu/presidentia ... on-drones/Hillary was the only democratic candidate at the start of the primaries who supported drones outright.
And also, failing to close Gitmo isn't as simple as failing to deliver on a promise. Politics is complicated. Her songs aren't, so yea I'm repulsed.