A film following the larks, mishaps and sexual competition between three housemates in '60s London - a hapless schoolteacher (Michael Crawford as proto Frank Spencer), aggressively lascivious playboy mod and an Irish artist (whose first course of business is to paint a room Margiela white). It's absolutely gorgeously and effortlessly stylish - an absolute pleasure just to soak up the atmosphere and scenes. Everything is treated with a detached air of coolness and levity helped greatly by the jazzy musical score. There's slapstick abound, visual gags everywhere, a hyper-kinetic camera and editing (even a Benny Hill section) and a hilarious greek chorus of disapproving old folk commenting relentlessly on the behaviour of the youths.
This is all in stark and, increasingly, discomforting contrast to the primary theme of the film - male sexual conquest, misogyny and ultra-masculinity. It's easy to feel uncomfortable during the later parts of the film - unclear whether events and the reactions to them are poignant (though never moralising) commentary on the consequences of the debauched lifestyle led by swingin' youths and the hyper-sexual cultural milieu, or a sexist and callous relic of filmmaking and attitudes best left forgotten forever. Given the distance the subject is treated and lack of moral stance the film takes on its happenings, together with the continually irreverent humour and stylish filming, it is easy to take the second stance - one that I don't feel is especially fair or justified (though this film would certainly be handled very differently filmed today). I feel like the film (and play it's based on, written by Ann Jellicoe - her gender perhaps noteworthy evidence in establishing the intent of the story) is intentionally taking us to the extremities of what hyper-masculine sexual culture offers and by remaining aloof, light and detached while dealing with the very real consequences of this it confronts us (or more intentionally, our '60s audiences to whom this lifestyle and manner of thinking is perhaps more pervasive?) with the terrific gender-power imbalance, potential for serious harm and the ethical bankruptcy in treatment both towards women as a gender and the aftermath of sexual trauma. It's astonishingly bold, discordant and provocative beneath its easy, dazzling, frivolous surface.
Highly recommended.







Plot spoilers below: