by sidewalk » Tue Sep 02, 2014 4:47 pm
It's not "awful" as navin suggests (good job being helpful when somebody asks for it), but you can't even see part of it, so it might as well be a crotch shot. I think those shorts look cool, but the black + brown isn't working. It would look better with just a white tee. Better yet, try something more interesting and solidified to play off those pockets, because when you just have a simple t and nb's the design of the shorts looks incidental and you'd be better off with just regular chino shorts (as it stands its just an unnecessary detail since you're not utilizing it).
edit: "yeah the photo is pretty lousy too"
didn't know this was a photography site. i dont see any problem aside from that you cant see the top half of his shirt. as long as everything is distinguishable, these photography nerds should stfu. quality and lighting is better than hmwuts a couple pages ago, which i see you + repped, so be a bit more consistent with your criticism.
he didn't complain about negs. he asked why he got them. the negs are a symbol of something, not an end-all that isn't subject to scrutiny. he asked for help, and he asked why, likely so he can try to work it out in the future.