by alby » Mon Feb 09, 2015 1:00 am
In general, Nikon sensors are more advanced than Canon, but Canon has (GENERALLY) cheaper lenses. (Cannon 50 is ~100, Nikon 50 is 200) but you shouldn't buy into a system based on prices of lenses. If you get a chance to hold either of the systems camera, go with the system that feels nicer in your hands. I liked Nikon more, so I went for a D5100. I don't regret it, though I do wish I could get some Canon glass sometimes.
In terms of the Nikon APS-C senor cameras (D3x00, D5x00, D7x00, Dx0), the D7000 + D71000 are the nicest cameras of the bunch. I wish I would have spent the extra for a D7000 at the time. They come with an extra dial and more control with a better sensor. That being said, no camera in the entry level price range is bad. It comes down to preference. If I could go back, I would have bought a D90. The D90 is the predecessor to the D7000, and comes with the extra dial. It's also important to note that the D7000, D7100, and D90 have an autofocus motor in body, which the D5x00 and D3x00 do not. This means that old nikon lenses (Anything labeled AF-D) will only focus on the bodies with the internal autofocusing motor. I cannot mount a 28 mm 2.8D lens on my D5100 and expect it to autofocus. For most people that aren't too serious about photography, this isn't a problem.
I wish you luck in deciding, it's stressful. Try to fully explore your options before buying.
Edit: If you are at all interested in videography at all, Nikon falls kind of short in that department.
i'd walk a mile for a camel