by pirxthepilot » Wed Oct 12, 2016 1:29 pm
i dont actually know much about rafman but i have the impression he doesn't ultimately care a lot about the 'internal' (perceived?) ethos of the internet subcultures he cannibalises, seems like he's interested in using them to explore desire, lack, essentially the same themes as sophocles, cervantes, hitchcock. in this sense he probably is exploitative (rihanna stole my seashells!!).
im glad he does though. what 'ideas' prevail on the internet? vapid new age-ness, recycled rousseau-esque ideas about nature, flaccid humanist nostalgia, etc etc.
its like that amalia ulmann instagram performance piece where the third act of the burned out kardashian wannabe story is just her getting into meditation, yoga, detox juices which is almost certainly what someone like that character would do- so its form is true to/dictated by its medium. but this makes for bad art, because... oedipus/don quixote/scotty doesn't just fall into early C21st first world teen forms of pseudo-profundity.
(having said all this, i am interested in boredom, the ambient, passive repetition etc and those things are an intrinsic formal element of the subcultures were talking about)
Last edited by
pirxthepilot on Wed Oct 12, 2016 2:11 pm, edited 6 times in total.