by schiaparelli » Fri Dec 06, 2013 12:11 pm
agreed. after some time/thought i've realized there are certain fits i can't get behind because of how they articulate certain proportions & silhouette. but i think a lot of it too is that i have some latent "must look as thin as possible" mindset going on, and whenever i let go of it i realize i like super loose pants and the decrease in apparent slimness is irrelevant and also more than made up for by FEELING TWICE AS COOL
on the womenswear side there is this intense focus on finding "flattering" fits, "slimming" pieces, dressing for your "body type"; and so i think this creates a particular attitude of fear towards subverting traditional shapes. a lot of the language for women's fashion advice is couched in the assumption that everyone is moving towards this default-idealized silhouette (tall slim leggy hourglass kinda thing). what was always interesting for me was seeing people first discover how to own fashion & style to make themselves look as they wanted (but usually in the slim-hourglass model), and then be able to deconstruct and dump perceptions of what a feminine body should look like and explore ways of subverting trad body standards & stereotypes
it's interesting because i used to give a lot of advice on "here's how to accentuate your bust", "here's how to balance out your hips", "here's how to lengthen your legs" but sometimes i wonder if i'm reinforcing what people "should" look like instead of impressing people with the capability to explore proportions and silhouette through fashion cues