by pips » Tue Apr 07, 2015 8:48 am
I think it's unfair to judge whether a piece of garment is worth its price based on how interesting or boring it looks. Lots of well-designed clothes look so basic at first glance, not to mention there are lots of factors that go into pricing. Marketing and the brand name itself make up a big chunk of it, but if you remove that you have materials, labor, overhead, etc and also things like the amount of time and skill it took to construct and perfect the pattern for it, especially if it's something with a complicated construction. Fashion isnt just FASHION. Good design isn't limited to how fantastical or compelling it looks, even something as simple as a plain Rick shirt has details that set it apart from your regular Uniqlo tees. The weight and blend of the fabric (100% cotton), cut/drape/construction (single seam, irregular proportions), place of manufacture (Italy) plus the fact it's RO drive up the price. Yeah, it maybe just be a tshirt, but how many tshirts on the market can you find that fit and drape the same way?
I dunno, maybe it's because I tend to obsess over small details that arent obvious at first but I dont think clothes have to look interesting to be interesting or worth the high price. There's something wonderful about clothes that seem made just for you, fall just the right way, end at the perfect, precise spot on your leg or wrist or hip, or made with fabrics that feel magnificent against bare skin... all those little things make the price tag worth it. I think this is more apparent in womenswear with the wide range in body types, but if I manage to find a pair of jeans that can make me look like Lara Stone in a Calvin Klein ad I guarantee you I'd willingly hand over the cash for it (or if it's really way too expensive, hunt for it like a madwoman in secondhand markets). And that's just pants. I mean, even boring ass ethically made clothing are worth the extra cost if only to assuage your consumerist guilt.